|
"This will affect officers all over Michigan" State Appeals
Court Ruling Threatens Garrity Protection
A
Michigan's Court of Appeals decision, issued as this edition of
News 'n Views was going to press, looms as a "serious
threat" to the level of protection that has been provided by
Garrity for the 36 years since it was established.
That
is the somber assessment of MAP Executive Director Fred Timpner,
a view shared throughout police and law enforcement union ranks
around the state.
"This
will affect officers all over Michigan in an adverse way,"
Timpner declared, in reacting to the Court's ruling that Wayne County
Prosecutor Michael Duggan can access the Garrity statements of three
Garden City officers who were involved in a shoot-out last December.
The
gun battle resulted in the death of a man who had critically wounded
another officer shortly before it broke out.
That
incident set in motion a series of events that began, ironically,
after an assistant Wayne County prosecutor told officers were "clear"
of any wrongdoing. Chief Harvey read Garrity warnings to the officers
and ordered them to answer questions under that protection, so they
could return to duty as soon as possible.
However,
in February, an assistant prosecutor called Chief Harvey and demanded
that he hand over the Garrity statements for review. The chief refused,
saying the statements are privileged and cannot be released without
the officers' consent.
Prosecutor
Duggan then subpoenaed the statements through Wayne County Circuit
Judge Sean Cox. A show cause hearing resulted in an order for the
chief to turn over the documents or face a contempt of court citation.
A stay was granted for an emergency appeal to the Michigan Court
of Appeals.
Oral
arguments in what had become the People of Michigan vs. the City
of Garden City and the Michigan State Police Troopers Association,
Inc. were presented Sept, 3, judge's declaration that "this
(refusal to turn over the statements) cannot stand." Chief
Harvey was directed to surrender the Garrity documents.
Was
this ruling the end of the matter?
"I
firmly believe that this decision will be appealed all the way to
the United States Supreme Court, if that becomes necessary,"
Timpner asserted. "A fundamental right is at stake here, one
that the US Supreme Court, itself, established in Garrity vs. New
Jersey in 1967.
"Of
course the Michigan Supreme Court is the next step and there's no
doubt this case is headed there. Every officer and every police
union in Michigan, except perhaps one, is directly interested in
maintaining the integrity of Garrity protection.
"It's
noteworthy that Chief Harvey, obviously not a union person, has
stood staunchly against the Wayne County prosecutor's position.
He is to be commended, as is the Michigan State Police Troopers
Association, for defending Garrity so strongly."
The
State Troopers Association, like MAP, is a member unit of the Michigan
Association of Police Organizations (MAPO).
"MAP
and MAPO will do everything possible to support the position, and
the needs, of Michigan's law enforcement community in this matter,"
Timpner vowed.
|